At the bottom right is a menu with more options, such as displaying in full screen and customizing the layout to your liking. There is also the option to share your screen, or just one window of e.g. In video calls themselves, the functions are quite basic turning the camera and microphone on and off is done via the standard buttons. The simple interface makes Meet a bit easier to use than Microsoft Teams, but the choice between Teams or Meet (and Chat) really depends on which office suite you use within your company. All other Meet functions are in different places in G Suite, like planning calls, which is in Google Calendar. That’s actually all you see on the start screen of Meet itself. You can plan, start and join meetings on the right side of the screen, and there is an unmissable button to adjust general, video and audio settings. With an available subscription to G Suite, it is therefore advisable to choose Google Meet (and Chat). This brings integrations with it, just like Microsoft Teams with Office. Meet and Chat are both a standard part of G Suite, Google’s office suite. These names have only recently been given until a year ago, the service was called Hangouts. If you have a Google Account, you have access to Google Chat and Google Meet. The prices of Microsoft 365 are 4.20 euros per user per month for Essentials, 10.50 for Premium and 16.90 for Business. The company has recently improved the noise suppression quality, added a Tasks app, allowed users to log in with multiple accounts and added a data saver to the Android app. Microsoft continues to work hard on the development of Teams. It can be a decisive factor when making a choice. As far as we are concerned, these integrations are one of the biggest advantages of Teams for Microsoft users. It is also easy to share e-mail messages and attachments via Teams. This means that appointments in the calendar of Outlook, for example, are synchronized so that a user is displayed as “busy” during an appointment. What further distinguishes Teams are the integrations for Office 365 (soon to be Microsoft 365). Furthermore, there is a function that ensures that you are in the picture when you raise your arm, which can be useful for drawing attention if there is a problem with the connection that needs to be resolved. This can be done for multiple feeds, so in a video meeting, for example, both the administrator and a speaker can be displayed. However, a number of features stand out: for example, users can choose, during the call, which video feed is displayed, and that feed can then be fixed on the screen. of the standard buttons for microphone and camera. Here, however, we focus on the video conferencing side of the story, which is similar to many other apps – think e.g. Teams is not only a video conferencing tool but also a chat tool, with complete collaboration functionality. Moreover, this lack of clarity is no problem during an actual video meeting. That’s often the case with Teams, but in our opinion, that’s just a minor drawback, which gets less annoying over time. ![]() No problem once you know it, but we could imagine that some users only find out after they have been searching for a settings icon for a while. For example, the settings menu is located below the drop-down of the user’s profile. Sometimes it takes a few clicks to get to a particular option. As is the case with more products from the Office/Microsoft 365 family, it takes some time to get familiar with where all buttons and options are. The interface of Teams is quite clear, once you know where everything is. Teams could be a good choice for larger businesses. However, Skype is rapidly being phased out for the benefit of Microsoft Teams, the collaboration app that is included in Microsoft 365 subscriptions. Skype for Business is still a popular app for videoconferencing. We will list these characteristics below. There are some differences in terms of interface, ease of use, functionality and price. These apps all have the standard features for video conferencing, online meetings and are therefore in the spotlight these days. This article was originally published in 24 April 2020, but was updated on 15 January 2021. ![]() We compared five frequently used video conferencing apps and see which app is a good choice for which business situation. ![]() Often the news is only about privacy or exploding user numbers. ![]() Multiple apps for collaboration and video calls have appeared extensively in the media lately, but what’s a bit snowy is what the actual functionality is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |